Construction cranes at sunset
Location intelligence

GeoScore: the location index for Uzbekistan

3 axes · 9 subindexes · scores 0–100 on a hexagonal H3 grid. National coverage: 14 regions, 206 districts, 9,431 mahallas.

Green Startaccelerator participant
Methodology

Three axes, nine subindexes

The axes exist not for symmetry but because different groups take different aggregation operators. Opportunity and quality of place are compensatory, penalised for imbalance. Risk is non-compensatory: it is applied as a multiplier rather than averaged in.

Axis I · Opportunity

What is available to me here?

position

Position & regional access

How connected is this place to the country's settlement system?

mobility

Mobility & transport

How easily can you move from here?

services

Services & amenities

Can daily life be run from this address?

economy

Economic base & employment

Does this place work, or is it a dormitory?

Axis II · Quality of place

What is it like to live here?

environment

Environment & sanitary quality

What is the air, the noise, the greenery?

built

Built & housing environment

What is built here, in what condition, how well serviced?

community

Social environment & safety

Who lives here, and how safe is it?

Axis III · Risk

What can go wrong?

hazard_nat

Natural hazards

What threatens from nature?

hazard_tech

Technogenic & sanitary protection risks

What threatens from human activity?

Risk is not averaged in with amenities. A place in a dam-breach zone does not get better because there is a school nearby.

Why 50 is the norm, not the middle

For every indicator, the 0 and 100 points come from a source outside the project — Uzbekistan's urban planning norms (ShNQ), sanitary norms (SanEpid), WHO guidelines, the 3-30-300 rule, the DEGURBA classification, World Bank seismic hazard maps. Percentiles are forbidden in the main index.

0
the facility is absent, or the norm is grossly violated
25
the lower bound of what is acceptable
50
the national norm is met
75
good practice
100
benchmark: international best practice or the physical maximum

What this changes in practice

"Jizzakh 34, Tashkent 80" does not read as "Jizzakh is in the bottom third". It reads as "the average location in Jizzakh falls short of the norm; the average location in Tashkent exceeds it".

Design principles, indicator admission rules, the aggregation scheme and the open questions — in a separate document.

Full methodology →

What GeoScore deliberately excludes

Price. GeoScore is an input to our valuation models, so putting price inside the index would make it circular.

Plans and dynamics. "Where is this place heading" is a separate momentum index; GeoScore answers "what is it now".

Registry coverage today

The index registry holds 329 indicators, and it keeps growing. Below you can see the current picture of the data.

22%
already in the data
24%
we compute ourselves
18%
partially available
37%
statistics and calculations from external sources

Data sources and external anchors

For every indicator, the 0 and 100 points come from a source outside the project — not from the distribution of our own data.

WHO AQG 2021

Air quality guideline — anchor for environmental indicators

WHO ENG 2018

Noise level guideline — anchor for acoustic indicators

3-30-300

Urban greenery rule: a tree from every window, canopy over a third of the block, a park within 300 m

DEGURBA

International settlement-type classification — for context-aware normalisation

ShNQ

Uzbekistan's urban planning norms and rules — service radii for schools, clinics and transit stops

SanEpid

Sanitary protection zones — anchor for technogenic risk

World Bank PGA

Seismic hazard map — anchor for natural risk

Sentinel-2/5P · ESA

Satellite imagery — built form, terrain and vegetation

Map

Interactive map

All indices and sub-indices in one place.

Send a request
GeoScore map demo

A worked example (illustrative)

A sample location in Tashkent's Yunusabad district. This illustrates the method — it is not the result of a real API query.

positionPosition & regional access62
mobilityMobility & transport74
servicesServices & amenities81
economyEconomic base & employment58
environmentEnvironment & sanitary quality69
builtBuilt & housing environment71
communitySocial environment & safety65
hazard_natNatural hazards88
hazard_techTechnogenic & sanitary protection risks92

The overall GeoScore is deliberately not shown here: axis and subindex weights are still being calibrated — see the coverage section above.

GeoScore API

REST JSON · JWT · 100 requests/min · Swagger docs

A score for each subindex.

Get a key

API response format

GET /v1/geo-score?lat=41.299&lon=69.240

{
  "subindexes": {
    "position":     62,
    "mobility":     74,
    "services":     81,
    "economy":      58,
    "environment":  69,
    "built":        71,
    "community":    65,
    "hazard_nat":   88,
    "hazard_tech":  92
  },
  "confidence": "HIGH"
}

Frequently asked questions

How is GeoScore calculated?

Every indicator is normalised against an external anchor — a WHO guideline, a building code, a physical limit — rather than the distribution of our own data. Indicators roll up into subindexes, subindexes roll up into one of three axes, and risk is applied as a multiplier rather than averaged in with the rest.

Why is 50 the norm, not the middle?

An ordinary rating is a percentile: the score moves when other places move. We anchored the scale to external norms instead: 50 means the national norm is met. A place does not get worse because a new school was built in a different city.

How is GeoScore different from WalkScore?

WalkScore is, in essence, a single pedestrian-amenity-access score calibrated on American cities. GeoScore is three axes and nine subindexes for Uzbekistan — opportunity, quality of place and risk — with risk applied as a multiplier rather than averaged in with amenities.

How does a bank use GeoScore?

A bank might set a rule such as: if the hazard_nat subindex falls below a threshold, require additional insurance or reduce the LTV. GeoScore plugs into credit scoring as an objective, reproducible input — it does not replace the credit committee's decision.